| Guest_Anonymous_* |
Nov 28 2001, 08:41 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Guests |
Hi Peter,
I've recently upgraded my Windows 2000 Professional system from a > Pentium 3-500MHz with 512MB of RAM to > Pentium 4-1.5GHz with 1.5GB of RAM and noticed that interpolation of larger images has slowed drastically. I have tried upgrading to the latest version (v2.31), to no avail - interpolation under the supposedly slower system was smooth and faster. Under the Pentium 4 system, PMView interpolates larger images in a choppy manner, and is at least a magnitude slower to complete the render. Any ideas? Thanks, - Wade |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Guest_Anonymous_* |
Dec 10 2001, 12:34 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE Originally posted by Peter:
[b:post_uid0]This sounds very strange. I'd say that there might be something odd with your L1/L2 cache settings. What cache size did your Pentium III have? How about the P4? Or is this maybe just a display driver issue? Is the rendering choppy also when you disable interpolation? [/b:post_uid0] Thanks for your reply, Peter - the cache settings are equivalent across both processors. I am using SDRAM with the P4 (on an Asus P$ mainboard), if it makes any difference. When I disable interpolation, the jagged edges occur in some images which are sized down to the display resolution (1024x768), but no artifacts, etc. are evident. Are there libraries or settings from past PMView installs which may affect the rendering engine? This system is using the latest ATI All-in-One Radeon drivers for Windows 2000. Thanks, - Wade |
|
|
|
Anonymous Interpolation slower from Pentium3 -> 4 Nov 28 2001, 08:41 PM
Peter This sounds very strange. I'd say that there might... Dec 8 2001, 01:57 PM
Peter QUOTE Originally posted by wader:
When I disable i... Dec 13 2001, 07:16 AM
Anonymous Hi Peter - the rendering is fast with interpolatio... Dec 17 2001, 06:26 PM
Anonymous BTW, not sure if this was clear, but rendering wit... Dec 19 2001, 12:27 AM
Peter This sounds very strange. The only explanation I h... Dec 19 2001, 05:22 PM
Anonymous Maybe, though I haven't noticed such problems for ... Dec 19 2001, 05:55 PM
Anonymous Peter, I tried some graphics benchmark tests and c... Dec 20 2001, 11:48 PM
Peter Are you sure that you're not running in 256 color ... Dec 21 2001, 05:44 AM
Anonymous QUOTE Originally posted by Peter:
. . . (Interpola... Jan 14 2002, 08:14 PM
Anonymous Peter,
Would you recommend any types of tests I co... Jan 21 2002, 01:38 PM
Peter Try a 1600x1200 GIF and a 1600x1200 color JPEG.
... Jan 22 2002, 02:01 PM
Anonymous QUOTE Originally posted by Peter:
Try a 1600x1200 ... Feb 9 2002, 08:00 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th August 2026 - 03:14 PM |